Talk of secession was nothing new in 1860. You can read more about various states and territories at this previous post. One of the less discussed secession movements occurred in late 1861 and early 1862 and dealt with the southern part of Illinois. There were some who wanted that portion of the state to form a new state and join the Southern Confederacy.
William J. Allen |
Allan G. Bouge, in The
Congressman’s Civil War, writes of another attempt of secession in
Illinois. U.S. Congressman William J. Allen, “openly advocated the division of
Illinois so that the southern region might secede to join the Confederacy.”
William J. Allen was born in 1829 in Wilson County, Tennessee. His family moved
to Illinois about 1830. He was educated in local schools and received his law
degree from the Law Department at the University of Louisville in 1848. He was
admitted to the Illinois bar in 1849, practiced law, served in the Illinois
House, was a U.S. Attorney, and was Judge of the Illinois Circuit Court. Allen
ran as a Democrat and won a seat in the 37th United States Congress,
replacing John A. Logan, who had resigned to accept a commission as colonel of
an Illinois Infantry Regiment.[2]
William J. Allen
undoubtedly caused quite a stir across the Northern states when he was arrested
in September 1862, along with several others, for involvement with the Knights
of the Golden Circle. A Chicago newspaper considered Allen “an undisguised
secessionist” and thought he “ought to be beaten.” In reality, Allen had
probably agreed with the sentiment expressed throughout many southern Illinois counties:
the southern portion of the state should secede and join the Southern Confederacy.
One source even stated that Allen had openly proposed this to John A. Logan and
had encouraged Illinois men to go south and enlist in the Southern army.[3]
Allen was taken to
Cairo with several others and was placed on parole and allowed the freedom of
the city, but they were required to check in once a day. There was apparently
no writ or warrant for their arrest. On September 2, Allen was supposed to be
heading to the Old Capitol Prison in Washington, D.C. However, since he was
sick, he was left in a hotel in Springfield, Illinois. It is not clear if Allen
was ever incarcerated in the Old Capital Prison. On September 10, 1862, Lincoln
wrote to Maj. Gen. John A. McClernand that Allen “may be discharged if you
advise it, on such terms as you may advise.” One newspaper reported that Allen
was back in Springfield by early October.[4]
Despite his arrest
and incarceration, Allen was again on the ballot for election to the U.S.
House, again running as a Democrat. And despite his alleged support of the
secession of the southern half of Illinois, he again won that election, serving
until 1865. He did not run for re-election. Allen did serve in the Illinois
constitutional convention of in 1862 and 1870, as a delegate to the Democratic National
Convention from 1864 to 1888 and received a recess appointment from President
Grover Cleveland in April 1887 to serve as a Federal judge on the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, and position that was
later confirmed and one that Allen held until his death in 1901.
Information about
Allen and the secession of Southern Illinois is hard to come by. James M.
McPherson’s Battle Cry of Freedom, considered the standard work on the
war, makes no mention of William J. Allen. Neither does Weibley’s A Great
Civil War, nor Keegan’s The American Civil War. A reader must turn
to older texts, such as Allan Nevins’s War for the Union, 1862-1863
(1960) or Cole’s The Era of Civil War, 1848-1870 (1919). The rampant dissatisfaction
caused by the radicals in the Federal government seems to be swept under the
rug.
[1] “The
Illinois North-South Split.” Chicago Tribune, October 1, 2015.
[2] Bouge,
The Congressman’s Civil War, 43.
[3] Bellow
Falls Times, September 19, 1862; Chicago Tribune, September 26,
1862; Illinois State Journal, July 30, 1862. See also Cole, The Era
of the Civil War, 1848-1870, 302.
[4] Marshall,
American Bastile, 295, 393-394; Basler, Collected Works of Abraham
Lincoln, 5:413; The Brookville Jeffersonian, October 15, 1862.
Great article. I like the statement that these events seem to be "sweep under the rug'. Things that don't fit the official narrative often get ignored. Great that information like this is brought to light.
ReplyDelete