In 1863, Federal
general Ambrose Burnside authorized the execution of two Confederates captured
in Kentucky. Burnside issued a general order after the capture of the pair,
William F. Corbin and Thomas J. McGraw, members of the 4th Kentucky
Cavalry who were out recruiting. That order stated that anyone caught in
Federal-occupied territory recruiting for the Confederacy “will be tried as
spies or traitors, and if convicted will suffer death.” You can read more about
that event here.
Word reached
Richmond in mid-May 1863 that Corbin and McGraw had been tried as spies, found
guilty, and sentenced to be shot.[1]
By June, newspapers in Richmond were reporting that the pair had been executed.
A fellow member of the 4th Kentucky Cavalry wondered that since the
United States government claimed “as their boundary the whole of the
Confederate States” how could anyone recruit for Confederate service “without
subjecting himself to a like treatment in the event of his capture? It is to be
inferred that the President sanctioned the act of Gen. Burnside, and that it is
quite probable that other commanders will adopt a similar policy. . . If in the
great struggle for independence our enemies force us, by such acts, to resort to
their barbarous mode of warfare, they will be the responsible party. We must
fight our enemies with their own weapons.”[2]
Libby Prison
The public cried out
for some type of reprisal. One Virginia newspaper editor believed that Capt.
William P. Kendrick and Capt. Daniel E. Bonham, 3rd Tennessee
Cavalry (US) recently captured while recruiting in Tennessee, should meet the
same fate as Corbin and McGraw.[3]
Confederate officials were already moving in that direction. On May 22, Robert
Ould, chief of the bureau of exchange, sent a letter to his Federal counterpart,
Lt. Col. William H. Ludlow, that the Confederate government had selected two
Federal prisoners of War to meet the same fate. Northern newspapers, Ould
informed Ludlow, reported that five or six Confederate prisoners captured while
recruiting had also been condemned to death. “In view of the awful vortex into
which things are plunging I give you notice,” Ould wrote,” that in the event of
the execution of these persons retaliation to an equal extent at least will be
visited upon your own officers, and if that is found ineffectual the number
will be increased. The Great Ruler of nations must judge who is responsible for
the initiation of this chapter of horrors.”[4]
On July 4, 1863,
Brig. Gen. John H. Winder issued Special Order 160: Captain T. P. Turner, in
charge of the Federal prison in Richmond, was to select two Federal officers by
lot for execution.[5]
There are
conflicting reports as to how the two men were selected. A Richmond newspaper
reported that the prisoners, all captains, were “formed in a hollow square
around a table” were they were informed of Winder’s order; “A slip of paper,
with the name of each man written on it and carefully folded up, was then
deposited in a box on the table, and Captain Turner informed the men that they might
select who they pleased to draw the names out—the first two names drawn to
indicate the men to be shot.”[6]
Many years after the war, a Federal prisoner recalled that on July 6, the
imprisoned captains were taken to lower room and informed of the order that two
captains were to be selected by lot and executed in retaliation for the
execution of Corbin and McGraw. One of the officers present “suggested that a
number of white and black beans should be placed in a hat, and that one of the
Chaplain prisoners should hold the hat up in the air, and then the captains
should step up and draw out a bean, and the first black bean drawn should be
the ‘First Death Prize.’ The second black bean drawn should be the ‘Second
Death Prize.’”[7]
Regardless of the
method, the names chosen were Capt. Henry W. Sawyer, 1st New Jersey
Cavalry, and Capt. John Flinn, 51st Indiana Infantry. They were
taken to Winder’s officer and permitted to write letters, then returned to
Libby Prison where they were kept “in close confinement.”[8]
The Official Records actually contain a letter written by Sawyer and
Flinn, addressed to Winder, in which they complained that they were being
executed for two men Burnside had executed. “Of these persons we know nothing,
nor if the circumstances attending them,” the pair wrote. They were not
connected to that part of the army, and believed that they should not be
punished “for the alleged offenses of any other department of the army than
which we served.” Instead, the two members of the Tennessee cavalry regiment
should forfeit their lives, or some “other officers of like rank from
Burnside’s department.”[9]
The post-war
article author wrote that the execution was to take place before noon the same
day the names were drawn. The two “bade our companions farewell, and
distributed a few trinkets we had on our persons, and then confided to our
warmest friends a few messages for our families.” The guards appeared, and
Sawyer and Flinn were escorted through the streets of Richmond in a cart being
pulled by oxen. On the outskirts of the city, they met a Catholic priest, and
Flinn complained that he was being executed without the “rites of clergy.” A
reported friend of Jefferson Davis, the Priest rushed to Richmond to try and
intervene. When the pair and their escort reached the tree, they stood in the
cart while ropes were placed around their necks. The captain of the guard
continued to wait, seemingly hoping for a message. The condemned sat down and
then, as noon neared, stood again. As the “Confederate officer was raising his
sword as a sign to the driver to move away… a cloud of dust was observed in the
distance, and the Confederate officer hesitated for a few moments, when a
horseman covered with dust, and his horse covered with foam, dashed up to the
officer and handed him a dispatch. He opened it quickly and read, Captains
Sawyer and Flinn are reprieved for ten days.”[10]
Given that prison commander wrote Winder that the names were drawn on July 6
and Sawyer and Flinn addressed Winder by letter on July 11, the story related
above seems unlikely.[11]
Lieutenant Colonel
Ludlow passed the news of the pending execution of Sawyer and Flinn up the
chain of command on July 12, recommending that two Confederate officer
prisoners of war be selected in retaliation.[12]
Ould wrote Ludlow the following day, hoping to send “a communication more fully
setting forth the views of the Confederate authorities in relation to the
unjust and barbarous execution of Captains Corbin and McGaw.”[13]
There was an enormous amount of correspondence flowing between Ould and Ludlow
at this point in time, dealing with prisoner exchanges, including those
captured earlier in 1862 and 1863, Vicksburg prisoners and Gettysburg
prisoners. The Richmond Daily Whig reported in mid-July that Confederate
Vice President Alexander Stephens was sent to Old Point to try and work out
“the atrocities of the enemy… particularly in the case of Captains Corbin and
McGraw.”[14]
Lincoln was willing to travel to Fortress Monroe to meet with Stepens, but
Lincoln’s cabinet refused and Stephens returned to Richmond.[15]
The Lincoln
administration turned up the heat on the matter. On July 15, General-in-Chief
Henry Halleck ordered Ludlow to “immediately place General W.H.F. Lee and
another officer selected by you not below the rank of captain, prisoner of war,
in close confinement and under strong guard, and that you notify Mr. R.
Ould…that if…Sawyer…and…Flinn… or any other officers or men in the service of
the United States not guilty of crimes punishable with death by the laws of
war, shall be executed by the enemy, the aforementioned prisoners will be hung
in retaliation.” Ludlow did not need any further orders; if he heard of the
execution of Sawyer and Flinn, he was to execute Lee and William S. Winder.[16]
Lee was the son of Army of Northern Virginia commander Robert E. Lee; Winder
was the son of John H. Winder. The threat of executing the two men quickly
eased some of the tension. On February 25, 1864, Sawyer was exchanged for Lee,
with the exchange of Flinn for Winder shortly thereafter.[17]
All of this begs the answer to the question of why Burnside
was not held responsible for the deaths of Corbin and McGraw.
[1] Richmond
Dispatch, May 16, 1863.
[2] Richmond
Enquirer, June 23, 1863.
[3]
Richmond Dispatch, June 24, 1863.
[4] Official
Records, Series II, 5:691.
[5] Official
Records, Series II, 6:82.
[6] Richmond
Dispatch, July 7, 1863.
[7] Stradling,
“The Lottery of Death,” McClure’s Magazine, (November 1905), 95.
[8] Richmond
Dispatch, July 7, 1863.
[9] Official
Records, Series II, 6:107.
[10] Stradling,
“The Lottery of Death,” McClure’s Magazine, (November 1905), 97.
[11] Official
Records, Series II, 6:87, 107.
[12] Official
Records, Series II, 6:108-9.
[13] Official
Records, Series II, 6:114.
[14] Daily
Richmond Whig, July 14, 1863.
[15] Schott,
Alexander H. Stephens of Georgia, 379-80.
[16] Official
Records, Series II, 6:118.
[17] Parker,
Richmond’s Civil War Prisons, 83 n31.
Rooney Lee's wife, distraught with emotional sickness over the imprisonment & possible fate of her husband would pass during Christmas eve in 1863 despite the efforts of Lee & his wife to buck up Rooney's wife to the difficult situation. When Rooney was exchanged in Mar. of 1864, Lee woul ask J.E.B. Stuart & Rooney to go with him to Gordonsville to prepare for the challenge of the coming Spring offensive. When J.E.B. was killed May of 1864 - Rooney would later take over a reformed brigade of calvary, which had been mostly J.E.B.'S
ReplyDelete